Salma Ewing vs Angeles Rodriguez-Rizo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In recent months, the second serve performance of the two players has been a crucial talking point. Rodriguez-Rizo has managed to win 33.33% of points on their second serve, while Ewing has fared slightly better with a 39.64% success rate. These statistics hold significant importance in match prediction accuracy.

When examining return game stats, Ewing's prowess becomes more evident. Ewing has secured 53.23% of their opponent's second serve points and 33.68% of first serve returns. In contrast, Rodriguez-Rizo's success rate stands at 47.06% for second serves and 26.83% for first serve returns. These numbers suggest a clear advantage, heavily influencing the prediction of who is favored in this head-to-head matchup.

The ability to handle pressure is a pivotal factor in tennis, and here, Ewing exhibits superior performance. Ewing has successfully saved 54.49% of breakpoints, a stark contrast to Rodriguez-Rizo, who has saved only 14.29%. This aspect is crucial for in-game betting predictions, providing insight into which player is likely to maintain composure during critical moments.

Performance over the past year further differentiates the two. Rodriguez-Rizo has not secured any match victories, with a win/loss record of 0/2, whereas Ewing boasts a win rate of 45.45% from a 15/18 record. These statistics provide a telling overview of their overall head-to-head performance.

Both players have shown distinct preferences for playing surfaces. Rodriguez-Rizo has not yet won any matches on hard courts (0/4), while Ewing thrives on the same surface, achieving a 60% win rate (76/51). Notably, Ewing's worst performance comes on indoor hard courts, reflected in a 0% win rate (0/1).

Examining their experience levels, Rodriguez-Rizo has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments ($10K level), winning none of their matches in the last year (0/2). Ewing, competing at the Challengers/ITF level (over $10K), has achieved a 47.62% win rate (10/11). This experience disparity plays a significant role in assessing event level relativity and prediction.

In terms of quality of opposition, Rodriguez-Rizo's opponents have an average ranking of 389 compared to Ewing's 353.55, illustrating Ewing's experience against higher-ranked players. Additionally, in deciding set situations during the past year, Ewing has a modest win rate of 17%, while Rodriguez-Rizo has yet to win a deciding set. This aspect is crucial for live predictions and betting if the match extends to a deciding set.

Current event head-to-head statistics are essential for anticipating player form, although they vary based on the player's past performances in similar tournaments. When considering breakpoint opportunities, Rodriguez-Rizo has converted 50% of their chances recently, outperforming Ewing, who has a conversion rate of 41.59%. This is a vital factor for in-game live betting, especially during breakpoint scenarios.

In light of these statistics, Ewing emerges as the predicted victor, with stronger performance indicators in nearly all critical areas compared to Rodriguez-Rizo.